Skip to main content

What is the distance between Sun and all of the planets?

Distances in space can be represented in two ways: Kilometers (km) or Astronomical Units (AU). An astronomical unit is the distance between Earth and the Sun and is usually used to measure distances within our solar system. It must be noted that the distance varies for each planet because of its orbit around the Sun. Orbits are not circular; rather, they form an ellipse or oval. Before modern technology, astronomers measured the parallax of an object to determine its distance away from another point. We now have the technology to measure distance more directly by using spacecraft and radio signals. I included Pluto in the table, but it is no longer considered a planet in our solar system. At certain points in its orbit, Pluto is actually closer to the Sun than Neptune.


Planet


Distance 
(from Sun)



Mercury


57,910,000 km
0.387 A.U.



Venus


108,200,000 km
0.723 A.U.



Earth


149,600,000 km
1.000 A.U.



Mars


227,940,000 km
1.524 A.U.



Jupiter


778,330,000 km
5.203 A.U.



Saturn


1,424,600,000 km
9.523 A.U.



Uranus


2,873,550,000 km
19.208 A.U.



Neptune


4,501,000,000 km
30.087 A.U.



Pluto


5,945,900,000 km
39.746 A.U.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.