Skip to main content

What are the key ways that Simmel's discussion of value differs from Marx's labor theory of value?

Georg Simmel (1858-1918), a German sociologist, published his thoughts on value as it relates to currency in "The Philosophy of Money" (1900).  Simmel's main theme in the work is the impersonal nature of money among people in society.  He argues economic exchange is a social interaction and money is the medium of the exchange.  Money is merely the token upon which both parties agree represents the exchange item, tangible or otherwise.  The impersonal nature of monetary exchange allows for growth of personal freedom, but can hinder personal growth due to social comparison. 


Simmel claims the impersonal nature of transactions limits the social interaction to the matter at hand; an exchange of goods or services.  The monetary system helps to overcome social isolation by creating a universal method of communication and understanding.  However, the dark side of value is the disparity which arises when one person feels socially outcast due to society deeming their contribution as lower value. 


Simmel's arguments can be easily understood when examining two groups of three people representing two socially isolated groups.  In each group there is a person to supply food, one to provide shelter and the third that performs entertainment.  In isolation, each member trades their skills as equal members.  When monetary value is ascribed to each skill, the two groups are no longer isolated and can exchange resources through trade.  However, if one entertainer is no longer considered useful the person can become a social outcast.  Simmel argues value can increase personal freedom but runs the risk of personal isolation.


Karl Marx (1818-1883) view on labor theory is different because he focuses on relational value with labor as the defining characteristic of trade versus money.  Marx assumes value is created in two ways; exchange value and use value.  Exchange value is the accepted cost of a good over an extended period of time.  Use value is the value placed upon a good depending on how useful the good is at any given point in time.  For example, a bucket of water may have no use value during a rainstorm, but an exchange value based on the need to store water long term.


Marx's view of value transforms into a labor theory on value because he claims people naturally assign value based on how hard they worked to produce the product.  Thus, money is merely a token of their labor rather than an actual evaluation of value.  Marx argues that labor is not necessarily comparable in brute strength, but in production time.  If a shirt and building a wall are exchanged for example and they take the same amount of time they are equal in labor value despite the carpenter working harder.


Marx and Simmel differ on the concept of value.  Simmel claims it is an impersonal designation designed to separate personal feelings and create individual freedom.  Marx argues it is connected to labor and people have an inherent connection to value.  They agree value is a driving factor in social relationship and exchange.  There mere presence of value alters the dynamics of the social relationship.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more