Skip to main content

How does Eliezer describe the impact of the madness of Mrs. Schächter on his companions in Night?

At first, the passengers of the car are panicking because they are not sure what is going on.  This woman is just screaming about a fire in the middle of the night and there is no fire to be seen.  They don’t know that at first, though. 



There was a moment of panic. Who had screamed? It was Mrs. Schächter. Standing in the middle of the car, in the faint light filtering through the windows, she looked like a withered tree in a field of wheat. She was howling, pointing through the window … 



Wiesel says that it took them “a long time to recover” from being woken up in this manner, and they were trembling.  The woman’s son tried to calm her down, and so do some other women.  She doesn’t quiet, and it wears on them. 



But it was all in vain. Our terror could no longer be contained. Our nerves had reached a breaking point. Our very skin was aching. It was as though madness had infected all of us. We gave up. A few young men forced her to sit down, then bound and gagged her. 



Their treatment of the woman may seem harsh, but you have to picture their situation.  The woman scares them.  Her screams make the experience, which is already frightening, terrifying.  She wears away at their nerves until they just gag her to get some peace. 


When she breaks free and starts screaming again, they hit her.  Wiesel says that these “several blows to the head” could have been fatal.  Again, the passengers are desperate.  They do not know where they are going or what awaits them, thus their cruelty.  Somehow, the woman’s screams are prophetic.  There is indeed a fire waiting for them.  The Nazis burned people alive in giant ovens or killed them in cyanide showers.  Few in this car would survive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.