Skip to main content

Compare Jay Gatsby and George Wilson, and show how they exemplify the corruption of the American Dream in The Great Gatsby.

Jay Gatsby and George Wilson are both striving for the American Dream: the idea that any American, through hard work and perseverance, can attain prosperity.  Neither one is successful in achieving the dream, however, and this fact helps to explain how the dream is a fictitious, even corrupt, one in this novel.  


Jay Gatsby has long desired to be rich, to run in the same circles as Daisy and Tom Buchanan.  However, unable to acquire this status honestly, through scrupulous hard work and legal means, he has resorted to illegal activities to earn his money.  Gatsby is a "bootlegger": someone who profits from the illegal production, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages during the era of American Prohibition.  He has made his money illegally, and this tarnishes it, producing only a corrupt version of the American Dream at best.  Gatsby has not achieved the dream; he only seems to have done so.


George Wilson, on the other hand, seems desperately poor regardless of how hard he works.  Living in the "valley of ashes," and running his garage, Wilson practically begs Tom to sell him the car that might turn him a bit of profit, and Tom puts him off again and again.  Wilson has tried to achieve the American Dream in the way someone is supposed to, and it seems an impossible task in a number of ways.


Thus, despite their dramatically different appearances, Gatsby and Wilson are very much the same: both men have tried to achieve the American Dream and found it to be impossible, a corrupt dream that is only that -- a dream.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.