Skip to main content

What occurs that makes Phillip wonder about Timothy's mental state?

In Chapter 11, Phillip starts to wonder whether Timothy is perhaps going a bit crazy, out of his mind from the stress, when the old man suddenly claims that their pet and companion, Stew Cat, might be the cause of their bad luck. Timothy seems to sneak around with a knife, causing Phillip to be horribly worried. The boy tries to make sure Timothy doesn't harm Stew Cat, and it's a tense chapter as the animal remains missing.


Finally, as the chapter comes to a close, Phillip realizes that Timothy has been carving an image of a cat out of wood and has placed nails in that image, trying to symbolically kill the bad luck that has plagued them. Even odder, Timothy has temporarily placed Stew Cat on their raft in the water while he did this task, so that the cat would be physically removed from the island while Timothy's work dispelled the "jumbi" (bad luck) caused by the feline.


"Maybe all that had happened was beginning to work on the old man's mind. Maybe I was stranded on a tiny, forgotten island in the Caribbean with a madman. If he harmed Stew Cat because of some silly jumbi thing, I knew he might also harm me," Phillip muses. 


This incident is important to the novel because it shows one of Timothy's weaknesses; in this episode, Timothy genuinely gives Phillip cause for worry and additional stress. The chapter, then, makes Timothy's character more realistic and believable. Throughout most of the novel, Timothy is nearly angelic, showing constant patience to Phillip and providing for him in knowledgeable, caring ways. This flaw of Timothy's (the belief in the silly concept of "jumbi" and that it can be controlled) helps round out his character and make him more human.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.