Skip to main content

In The Wednesday Wars by Gary Schmidt, what is wrong with Holling Hoodhood's perfect house?

Physically, almost nothing is wrong with Holling Hoodhood's perfect house.  It's right in the middle of town, it has a perfectly manicured lawn, and everything is painted to perfection.  The furniture is neat and orderly as well.  Everything is set to look and feel like a powerful architect is in control of every aspect of his house.  And that's exactly how it is.  Mr. Hoodhood is obsessed with having his house reflect him and his business.  The only thing that is physically wrong with the house is mentioned about halfway through the book.  In February, the entire newly plastered ceiling fell down and smashed all of the furniture underneath it.  


Emotionally though, Holling Hoodhood's perfect house is a mess.  It's a mess because it is a house, not a home. People live there, but the family doesn't act supportive or loving to each other.  Mr. Hoodhood doesn't care about Holling unless Holling might be able to help him get another contract.  Heather Hoodhood rebels against just about everything, and Mrs. Hoodhood is nothing more than a body taking up space.  The perfect house presents a false perfect image.  The house is emotionally cold and empty.  



The carpet looked like it had never been walked on. Which it almost hadn't. And the baby grand by the window looked like it had never been played. Which it hadn't, since none of us could.  But if anyone had ever walked in and plinked a key or sniffed the artificial tropical flowers or straightened a tie in the gleaming mirror, they sure would have been impressed at the perfect life an an architect from Hoodhood and Associates.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more