Skip to main content

In The Wednesday Wars by Gary Schmidt, what is wrong with Holling Hoodhood's perfect house?

Physically, almost nothing is wrong with Holling Hoodhood's perfect house.  It's right in the middle of town, it has a perfectly manicured lawn, and everything is painted to perfection.  The furniture is neat and orderly as well.  Everything is set to look and feel like a powerful architect is in control of every aspect of his house.  And that's exactly how it is.  Mr. Hoodhood is obsessed with having his house reflect him and his business.  The only thing that is physically wrong with the house is mentioned about halfway through the book.  In February, the entire newly plastered ceiling fell down and smashed all of the furniture underneath it.  


Emotionally though, Holling Hoodhood's perfect house is a mess.  It's a mess because it is a house, not a home. People live there, but the family doesn't act supportive or loving to each other.  Mr. Hoodhood doesn't care about Holling unless Holling might be able to help him get another contract.  Heather Hoodhood rebels against just about everything, and Mrs. Hoodhood is nothing more than a body taking up space.  The perfect house presents a false perfect image.  The house is emotionally cold and empty.  



The carpet looked like it had never been walked on. Which it almost hadn't. And the baby grand by the window looked like it had never been played. Which it hadn't, since none of us could.  But if anyone had ever walked in and plinked a key or sniffed the artificial tropical flowers or straightened a tie in the gleaming mirror, they sure would have been impressed at the perfect life an an architect from Hoodhood and Associates.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more