Skip to main content

What are some examples of conflict in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck?

A conflict is a struggle between opposing forces. Four major types of literary conflict appear in John Steinbeck's novella Of Mice and Men. These conflicts could be labeled person vs. fate, person vs. person, person vs. society and person vs. self. Person vs. fate is revealed in the book's title which comes from the Robert Burns' poem "To a Mouse." The poem suggests that fate often intervenes in the plans "of mice and men" and those plans go astray and are unrealized. In the book, George's, Lennie's and Candy's plan of buying their own "little piece of land" is shattered by fate when Lennie accidentally kills Curley's wife. In fact, Steinbeck imposes a rigid determinism on the character's of the book and none of them are able to break free of their individual fates.


The major person vs. person conflict appears in Chapter Three when Lennie, who has been innocently smiling over the dream of the farm, is challenged and attacked by Curley, who beats Lennie badly, until George gives Lennie the cue to fight. The seeds of the conflict are set up in Chapter Two, when George and Lennie first meet the belligerent boss's son. The conflict is important because it sets up the fury for revenge which overtakes Curley in the book's last two chapters.


Candy and Crooks are characters who struggle against society. Candy is old and unable to work as hard as he did before losing his hand, and so is helpless to the attitudes and prejudices of the other men, especially Carlson, who takes a dislike to Candy's old dog and ends up shooting it when Candy can't do it himself. Crooks is a victim of a society which looks down on his color and race. He is segregated and because of this segregation, deeply lonely.


The major internal conflict (person vs. self) of the book is within George. He loves his friend Lennie, but after the incident in the barn with Curley's wife, George is no longer able to stick up for Lennie. At the end of Chapter Five, he pleads with Curley to leave Lennie alone and not hurt him, but Curley, bent on revenge, will not hear it. Rather than let Lennie fall into the hands of Curley or the Sheriff, something Lennie would never understand, George steals Carlson's gun and shoots his friend. Only Slim seems to understand George's conflict at the end of the book when he tells George, "You hadda George. I swear you hadda."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.