Skip to main content

How does overpopulation negatively impact all aspects of the environment, air, water, and biodiversity?

Overpopulation is a condition in which the population exceeds the carrying capacity of the ecosystem. It negatively impacts our environment and its various biotic and abiotic factors. When the population exceeds the carrying capacity, adequate amounts of resources are not available for everyone. To ensure that our needs for space, food, fuel and other resources are satisfied, we tend to exploit the environment. For example, to get more space we cut trees, which decreases our green cover, reduces photosynthesis, and shrinks the habitat of a number of species. This in turn affects the biodiversity of the planet, increases air pollution and soil erosion, and interrupts the food chain, among many other things. Overpopulation also means the use of much more water, which means that the exploitation of water resources will increase. Overpopulation also causes the generation of more wastewater (which will need disposal). We will also need more electricity and amenities for the excess population.  


All of these will negatively impact our environment.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.