Skip to main content

How does the process of radioactive decay affect future volcanoes?

The core of the earth’s crust, about 1,800 miles below the surface, is the hottest part of the planet earth. Most of that heat is generated by a continuous decay of radioactive isotopes. The heat generated may cause core temperatures to rise above 5,000 degrees Celsius, radiating outwards and leading to considerable warming of gas, water, rocks and other geological materials.


As the heat radiates from its source at the core towards the earth’s surface, the warming effect gradually reduces, creating a geothermal gradient with a temperature difference of about 25 degrees Celsius for every kilometer of depth.


If underground rock formations become heated to temperatures between 700 and 1,300 degrees Celsius, they become partly melted. When mixed with gas and gas bubbles they form magma, which exists in the lower crusts, but whenever the magma bubbles to the earth’s surface as lava, a volcanic eruption is said to occur.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.