Skip to main content

What does Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird teach us about how people deal with issues of race and class?

Harper Lee portrays how various members of Maycomb's community deal with race and social class issues differently. There are characters throughout the novel who are openly prejudiced towards African Americans and individuals from lower social classes. Unapologetic racists like Mrs. Dubose and members of the Old Sarum bunch proudly oppose Atticus' decision to defend Tom Robinson. They do not care about what other people think and are not ashamed of their prejudiced beliefs. They wantonly voice their opinions in hopes of restricting African Americans' rights. Aunt Alexandra also openly displays her contempt for individuals from lower social classes by not allowing Scout or Jem to associate with them.


Harper Lee also displays how morally upright individuals like Atticus proudly stand up for what is right in the face of adversity. Atticus opposes the prejudiced beliefs of Maycomb and refuses to give into the community's threats. Atticus risks his reputation in order to do what is right and courageously defends Tom. He also teaches his children the importance of treating people equally regardless of their family background or social class.


Lee also depicts how certain individuals choose to quietly support prejudiced views. Miss Gates and Mrs. Merriweather do not blatantly express their prejudiced views but make inconspicuous comments that depict their beliefs. Harper Lee also illuminates how individuals quietly oppose Maycomb's prejudice. Characters such as Miss Maudie, Judge Taylor, and Heck Tate keep their opinions to themselves and privately support Atticus' cause. They are aware of the prejudiced feelings throughout town and do not want to draw attention to their opposing views.


Harper Lee shows her audience that individuals deal with race and social class issues in various ways. Some people proudly support their views and take action, while others choose to hide their feelings. Every individual has an opinion, and it is the way in which they express their opinions which makes them different.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more