Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's play Hamlet, Claudius has concocted a scheme to gain revenge against and ultimately kill Hamlet. How can I use this sequence chain...

A lot happens in this final act of Hamlet, so narrowing everything down to those five remaining boxes is challenging. If I were you, I would start with a list of all the major things that happen from Claudius arranging the duel until the end of the play. 


  • Hamlet has a philosophical chat with the gravedigger.

  • Ophelia's funeral comes by and Laertes is mourning very loudly and publicly, even jumping into her grave.

  • Hamlet jumps in too and starts fighting with Laertes about who loved Ophelia more.

  • Hamlet challenges Laertes to a duel.

  • [etc. until the end of the play]

After you have your list done, you can pick out the most critical parts. For example, for this first part, I can cut out Hamlet's conversation with the grave-digger entirely, because it isn't important to Claudius' murder plot. Then I would condense the other three bullet points so they fit into just one box: "Hamlet and Laertes fight in Ophelia's grave and Hamlet challenges Laertes to a duel."

Follow this method for Act 5, scene 2, and you should be able to come up with the last 4 boxes. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.