Skip to main content

Who is responsible for Macbeth's demise in Macbeth?

Although many factors contribute to Macbeth's imminent downfall, the play suggests that Macbeth alone is to blame for his own demise. He admits that his own ambition is the very reason he cannot prevent himself from committing evil deeds:



Stars, hide your fires;
Let not light see my black and deep desires...


I have no spur
To prick the sides of my intent, but only
Vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself
And falls on the other.



We know that Macbeth is encouraged by his wife and the witches' prophecy to pursue his ambition. He needs to murder king Duncan if he wants to ascend the throne. Nevertheless, his inability to stifle his unrestrained ambition causes him to transform himself from a loyal and valiant warrior to an evil tyrant. Once Macbeth kills the benevolent king Duncan, he does not stop until he gets rid of anyone who he feels threatened by (Banquo, Macduff's family, etc.).


By embracing evil, Macbeth deprives himself of peace and happiness. In Act V, he realizes that his life has become utterly meaningless: 



It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.



Macbeth has free will, and he chooses to follow through with his evil plan. Therefore, he alone is responsible for his downfall. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.