Skip to main content

Based on the description of the man at the doorway in the story "After Twenty Years" by O. Henry, do you think there was something strange about him?

The reader should sense that there was something strange about the man standing in the doorway because that was the effect O. Henry intended to produce. Here are the pertinent sentences:



Now and then you might see the lights of a cigar store or of an all-night lunch counter; but the majority of the doors belonged to business places that had long since been closed.




When about midway of a certain block the policeman suddenly slowed his walk. In the doorway of a darkened hardware store a man leaned, with an unlighted cigar in his mouth.



It is ten o'clock on a cold, wet, windy night. Most of the business places have been closed for hours. A well-dressed man is standing in the doorway of a darkened hardware store. What would such a man be doing there at that hour? Why doesn't he light his cigar? His only reason for being inside the doorway would be to light the cigar out of the wind and rain. But if he lit the cigar, wouldn't he have to stay in the doorway until he had smoked it?


When the man, whose name is Bob, starts talking to the cop, it turns out that he has a plausible reason for being there. The place used to be a restaurant. He had a date to meet his old friend Jimmy Wells at that restaurant but discovered that it had been torn down five years ago and replaced by shops. He had to stay in that spot because it was the only place where Jimmy could find him--if Jimmy remembered the appointment they had made twenty years ago.


Bob knows he looks suspicious. He doesn't like it. He tries a little too hard to act nonchalant. He lights his cigar to show (1) that that is why he is standing in a doorway, and (2) that he has nothing to hide. The reader is no longer suspicious of this man. He seems like a sentimental sort of fellow. He just wants to meet his old friend. He certainly couldn't have any intentions of burglarizing a hardware store. But the reader does not realize that Jimmy sees something different.



The man in the doorway struck a match and lit his cigar. The light showed a pale, square-jawed face with keen eyes, and a little white scar near his right eyebrow. His scarf pin was a large diamond, oddly set.



Jimmy recognized the man in the doorway as 'Silky' Bob, the fugitive wanted by the Chicago police. Jimmy also recognized the man as the old pal with whom he had an appointment that night at ten o'clock. Chicago would not have been able to send any kind of picture by wire, but there would have been an elaborate verbal description, including the pale, square-jawed face, the keen eyes, the little white scar near the right eyebrow, and the oddly set diamond scarf pin. 


O. Henry is ingenious in his descriptions. He gives a full description of the cop without revealing who he really is. He describes 'Silky' Bob by matchlight without letting the reader guess that Jimmy Wells is seeing his old friend and a wanted man in the same person. We realize in retrospect that Bob shouldn't have lighted that cigar right in front of a uniformed cop! Didn't Bob think the New York Police might have gotten word about him from Chicago?


O. Henry makes the reader think there is something suspicious about the man in the doorway. This is because the author wants the reader to believe that the cop also thinks there is something suspicious. And Bob knows that he looks suspicious, which explains why he does all the talking, thereby providing all the necessary exposition in the form of dialogue. The reader is reassured that Bob is just there to meet an old friend. But the reader doesn't understand until some twenty minutes later that the old friend was the cop to whom Bob was talking. Evidently Jimmy did not stop because Bob looked suspicious but because he was keeping his appointment to meet his old friend. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...