Skip to main content

Can you help me form a thesis about Shakespeare's Hamlet?I'd like to talk about Hamlet's view on life and how he never really intended to give up...

In spite of his fascination with decay and death (see the "poor Yorick" soliloquy), I don't think that Hamlet wants to commit suicide. In fact, he doesn't really want to do anything, except go back to school in Wittenburg.  But when he swears to avenge his father's murder in Act I, that path is closed to him.  The realization that his life as he knows it is already over leads him to contemplate his other options, none of which he finds very appealing. 


While many view Hamlet as suicidal, it could be argued that he's just struggling with existential angst. His father's death has obviously affected him a great deal, and he's wrestling with the absurdity of death and all of its unknowns throughout much of the play. His "To be or not to be" soliloquy is probably the most overtly "suicidal" speech, but in the end he concludes that not knowing what comes after death makes us remain "cowards" who continue living.  


In many ways, this mirrors his overall attitude regarding his primary dilemma. His hesitation to kill Claudius seems to be rooted in fear, so he spends much of the play simply stalling for time: faking madness, manipulating Ophelia's emotions, constructing ways to expose Claudius, toying with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and generally avoiding taking any real, meaningful action.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.