Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's Macbeth, how do the witches and Lady Macbeth influence Macbeth throughout the play?

The witches and Lady Macbeth are major instigators throughout the play. They push, encourage, or trick Macbeth into committing horrific acts and sealing his own fate, as redemption becomes more and more unlikely. In Act I, the witches appear and provide Macbeth with a first temptation: they tell him that he will be king, among other things. This awakens in Macbeth an underlying or hidden ambition - that is, to kill Duncan, and claim the throne.


When Lady Macbeth reads her husband's letter, and is thus informed of the prophecy, she immediately leaps into action. She persuades Macbeth to kill Duncan. She does this, mainly, by questioning his manly strength, and feeding his desire for power. She also tries to comfort him after the act.


Thus, we can say that Lady Macbeth builds upon what had already been planted by the witches in Act I. In Act IV, they reappear, but in a much different light. Now, they taunt Macbeth; they show him a procession of eight kings, all of which are descended from Banquo; they mock him by showing the (fatherly, manly, and kingly) success of Macbeth's moral foe. Thus, the witches exacerbate Macbeth's growing madness, and push him further toward his doom (that is, into open conflict with Macduff).


What about Lady Macbeth? At this point in the play, she has gone insane. Her death is crushing to Macbeth (see the "Tomorrow and tomorrow" soliloquy), and may well be his "final straw." All that is left for Macbeth to do is face Macduff, about whom the witches had warned him; Macbeth is unprepared, however, as they had declared that no man born of a woman could kill him. Sadly for Macbeth, Macduff was born by Caesarian.


Ultimately, we can argue that Lady Macbeth and the witches instigate both stages of Macbeth's downfall: first, they goad him into killing Macduff, and second, they add to his madness, despair, and insomnia. They are the spark, so to speak, which ignites the bloody action of the play.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.