The 1990s brought a number of floods to northwestern Australia. In 1998, the town of Katherine was destroyed by one of these floods. The Katherine flood was caused by Tropical Cyclone "Les." As Les made landfall and lost the energy provided by the warm gulf waters, it devolved from a cyclone into a rain depression. This process often leads to huge rainfalls, and this case was no different. Les dropped as much as 500 meters of water on the Katherine region during a three-day period; this caused the Katherine River to rise 20 meters (the river's largest rise in history). To make matters worse, the ground was already saturated since the area had experienced heavy rain shortly before Les hit. The resulting flooding caused more than 2,000 people to abandon their homes and resulted in millions of dollars of damage.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment