Skip to main content

Why didn't people believe what Alfred Wegener was saying about the continental drift?

Fellow scientists ridiculed Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift because he did not have a mechanism to explain how such a thing could happen, and because it went against currently accepted theories.


In 1911 Wegener, a German scientist, came across a paper that referred to fossils of animals and of plants that were identical to each other. The fact that these fossils were on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean made him search out and find more examples. The accepted theory at the time was that land bridges had once connected the continents, and that that was how these fossils could be found thousands of miles apart, with an ocean in between. Wegener also found similar land features, such as mountain ranges, that fit together when corresponding areas of the continents were matched up in a way similar to a jigsaw puzzle. The idea Wegener proposed for how the continents moved turned out to be incorrect--he thought the continents traveled through the Earth's crust. Plate tectonic theory eventually proved Wegener to be correct in his general theory--that the continents had indeed once been one large continent--but that they and the ocean floor were part of plates on the Earth's crust that moved relative to each other over the course of hundreds of millions of years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more