Skip to main content

What are some ways in which the colonizers benefited from imperialism?

There are at least three ways in which colonizers benefited from imperialism.  They benefited (or at least could potentially benefit) economically, militarily, and politically.


A major reason for imperialism was economic.  Colonizers were industrialized countries that needed sources of raw materials and new markets in which to sell their goods.  If they colonized countries that had resources that they needed, they could take those resources for themselves. They could produce finished goods and sell those goods back to the people in their colonies.  The colonized people would be a captive market, thus benefiting the colonizers.  For these reasons, industrialized countries often wanted to take empires.


A second reason for imperialism was military.  Powerful countries wanted to be able to project their military power around the globe.  When they took colonies, they could place naval bases in those colonies.  If England had, for example, a colony in Yemen, it could use that as a base for naval forces that would protect shipping that went between England and India through the Suez Canal.  In order to be more militarily powerful, European countries took colonies.


Finally, colonizers could benefit in political/prestige terms.  If a country had a large empire, it would seem much more important to other countries.  It would therefore have more political prestige and power.  This was another reason to have colonies.  In all these ways colonizers benefited, or at least felt that they benefited, from having colonies.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more