Skip to main content

Why do the citizens of Jonas' community believe that the strict rules of the community are good?

I believe your question is in reference to Lois Lowry's novel, The Giver, which tells the story of a young boy named Jonas who holds a special role in his highly regulated community. There are at least two answers I can think of.


First, the people of Jonas' community have grown up in this strict way of life and have grown accustomed to it. As we learn from the experience with Gabe, people who do not adjust well to society are "released." Because these people have been told all their lives that this is the way society ought to be, and all evidence points to the efficiency of such a community, they do not have any reason to believe otherwise. What's more, almost everyone in Jonas' community lacks knowledge or memory of things like suffering and joy. Life just is as it is for most people. It is not until Jonas is given these memories by his mentor that he comes to suspect that his community might not be ideal.


We should also consider the practicality of Jonas' society, which is arguably modeled after highly utilitarian or communist societies as described by Karl Marx. In a truly communist society, everything is done for the benefit of the community and organized through the state. While it's a very attractive idea to create a society that aims to entirely support all its members equally, we find in The Giver that some people still suffer and are sacrificed to achieve this ideal. The point I want to make is that the community Jonas grew up in is so highly regulated that it must have been "designed" at some point. The person or people involved in outlining and organizing such a controlled society must have believed that it was truly for the benefit of the community to impose such a strict degree of equality on all people. Even though it requires actions like the "release" of difficult babies, people in Jonas' community must have felt that their societal organization was the best way to do things. That is, if they questioned it at all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more