Skip to main content

Identify three major conflicts in the novel Chains by Laurie Hale Anderson.

There are quite a few conflicts in Chains, but there are four that stand out above the rest.  The first and most important conflict is Isabel vs. slavery.  This conflict holds throughout the entire book in that Isabel is a thirteen-year-old who is under the true chains of slavery during the time of the American Revolution.  Isabel is promised freedom, denied that freedom, sold to a different owner, and offered respite from Rebel soldiers.  This is all part of this original and most important conflict.  Next, there is the conflict of Isabel vs. Mrs. Lockton.  Mrs. Lockton is Isabel’s current owner and treats Isabel very cruelly.  Mrs. Lockton even slaps Isabel in the face when Ruth is the one who laughs.  Thirdly, there is the conflict of Mr. Lockton vs. Mrs. Lockton.  Mr. Lockton is emotionally, verbally, and physically abusive to Anne Lockton.  Finally, considering this is the time of the American Revolution, there is also an important conflict of Loyalists vs. Rebels.  Isabel’s owners are Loyalists and are continually talking about this current conflict.  The Rebels, of course, are the soldiers that offer Isabel the possibility of freedom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.