Skip to main content

Why did the United states enter WWI?

The most common explanation for the US entry into WWI emphasizes that the US entered the war because of Germany’s policy of unlimited submarine warfare.  The US disapproved of Germany’s submarine warfare because it seemed cruel and because it was contrary to international laws that were supposed to guarantee freedom of the seas.  The US had been outraged, for example, when a German submarine sank the passenger liner Lusitania with over 1,000 civilians (among who were more than 100 Americans) onboard.  The Germans stopped engaging in this sort of tactic for a while in response to American criticism.


When Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917, US public opinion turned more strongly against the Germans.  This hostility was exacerbated by the revelation of the Zimmermann Telegram, in which the Germans tried to get Mexico to enter the war on the German side in exchange for which the Germans would defeat the US and give Mexico back the land the US had taken from it in the Mexican-American war.  This outraged Americans who felt that it was wrong for Germany to try to incite the US’s neighbor to go to war and who felt that it was wrong for Germany to promise to take away US territory.


Historians, then, tend to say that the US entered WWI because of its opposition to unrestricted submarine warfare and because of the Zimmermann Telegram.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more