Skip to main content

In The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus refers to Sisyphus as "the absurd hero." Discuss a real life person (historical or present) and a fictional...

First, let's talk a bit about what Camus means when he refers to Sisyphus as the "absurd hero." What makes Sisyphus absurd is his consciousness; his intelligence got him into trouble with the gods (as he arrogantly scorned them, besting Thanatos and denying Hades his due souls), but his consciousness is also the key to making his eternal torture in the Underworld bearable. The gods can ultimately force Sisyphus to do a certain task (pushing the boulder up the hill each day and watching it roll back down each night), but they cannot control his thoughts. In a futile universe, Sisyphus can convince himself (as we all must) that his task has meaning. As Camus writes, "The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy."


One fictional character who could be called an absurd hero is Jay Gatsby, the titular character of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Gatsby has worked so hard in order to earn the fortune that he believes will help him win back Daisy. When he could not earn his money legally, he turned to bootlegging (the illegal distribution and sale of alcohol during the Prohibition Era in the U.S.). The American Dream, the idea that anyone can prosper (lawfully) as a result of hard work and determination, is revealed to be false. Gatsby can only prosper when he turns to criminal activity, but this doesn’t seem to bother him at all. He can only focus on his hope, with his "heightened sensitivity to the promises of life." Despite Gatsby’s ability to keep dreaming despite whatever hurdles are thrown into his path, he is "preyed on" by others and his dreams are dirtied by the "foul dust [that] floated in [their] wake." His dream is futile—he cannot beat the system, although he keeps trying. He doesn’t even realize the futility, hoping until the last that "Daisy’ll call."


One real-life person we might call an absurd hero is Al Gore. For a long time, he has been concerned about climate change, and he’s tried very hard to draw attention to the problem and prompt change in the way we treat the environment so we don’t push it past the brink of saving. Despite Gore's data, facts, and statistics and the fact that the brink is edging closer, people continue to ignore his warnings. Nonetheless, he keeps trying. He is absurd because, despite the seeming futility of his speeches, he keeps giving them. He maintains the belief that we might listen and change, even though we don’t make the kind of strides necessary to reverse the damage we’ve already done to the environment or minimize it in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.