Skip to main content

What is the role of political parties in policy formulation?

Political parties exist for the purpose of promoting the shared policy positions of their candidates and voting constituencies. When we talk about conservative vs. liberal policies, we are, in a very general way, talking about how the government should pursue its goals. Liberals generally believe that the government should intervene to help solve society's problems, while conservatives prefer to let the free market increase economic opportunity, which, theoretically, helps improve peoples' lives through their own efforts.


In order for the parties to actually put their policy objectives into practice, they have to gain enough political power, usually by gaining electoral office in Congress and/or the White House. Health care is a good example of how this works. When Barack Obama took office in 2008, one of his main goals was to establish a national health care plan. This was a goal of the Democratic Party, and had been for a long while, but they had not yet gathered the political power to put it into place. There was a major effort to do so in the 90's during the Clinton administration, but the Democrats did not have enough seats in Congress to push it through. Just because a party has a policy doesn't mean it will actually be put into action, even when the president wants it. When Obama took office there were enough congressmen supporting this liberal policy to get it passed, but just barely. 


Very soon we will be seeing a good example of how party policy is formulated and publicly presented when the Democrats and Republicans hold their party conventions to officially nominate their presidential candidates. These will be the policy positions that Clinton and Trump run on as the election approaches. The losing party is not going to have much luck putting their policies into force; even the winning party will face obstacles in Congress if they do not have clear majorities in the House and Senate.


The major parties also use policy statements to drum up support from their party members and prospective voters. They know that they are not going to be able implement everything they want, but to keep their voters interested and active, they must give voice to their concerns and give them something to hope for.


In the end, as always in politics, it will be about power. If one party can win enough seats in Congress and also win the presidential election, they will be able to enact their policy proposals. This hasn't happened often in recent years, so we haven't seen a lot of major legislation passed, with the obvious exception of the health care bill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.