Skip to main content

Is Macbeth's fatal flaw ambition or pride?

Macbeth's fatal flaw seems to be ambition. After the three witches reveal the prophecy that Macbeth will one day be king, Macbeth and his wife hatch a plan to make sure that happens. The idea of murdering someone never entered Macbeth's mind until he heard about the possibility of being king.


In Act 1, Scene 7, Macbeth even admits that the only reason he has to kill King Duncan is ambition. He says, "I have no spur to to prick the side of my intent, but only vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself and falls on th' other."


Even after Macbeth kills King Duncan and becomes King of Scotland, his ambitions continue. He hires murderers to kill Banquo and his son Fleance because he wants to make sure his dynasty continues to his future son. 


All of the murderous decisions Macbeth makes in the play are a result of him wanting to be king, and then once he receives the crown, making sure he stays king and that it continues within his lineage. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.