Skip to main content

sentence - How to use the “not only . . . but also” construction?



I’m trying to create the following phrase:



It is important not only to ____ but also to ____ in general.



But the way I’ve written it above doesn’t sound that good to me. Since I’m not a native speaker, could anyone please help me to improve this?



Answer



The “not only X but also Y correlative conjunction gives copyeditors no end of headaches. The problem commonly encountered with it is that X and Y are supposed to be grammatically parallel, but frequently people mess this up, so it doesn’t read right. So copyeditors are forced to recast the sentence.


In the examples below, I will set the two things which “not only . . . but also” is governing — and which are therefore supposed to be parallel — in bold face.




For example, this would be wrong:



He not only ate shrimp but also cocktail sauce, too. [WRONG]



That doesn’t work because ate is a verb while cocktail sauce is a noun. Instead that should be written as:



He ate not only shrimp but also cocktail sauce, too. [RIGHT]



If you want to alternate on the verb, then one might try this:



He not only ate shrimp but also vomited it, too. [RIGHT, but ick!]



Here’s another wrong example:



I come not only to bury Caesar, but Brutus and Cassius as well. [WRONG]



That’s wrong because “to bury”“Brutus and Cassius”. They aren’t parallel. That should instead be one of:



I come not only to bury Caesar, but also to praise him. [RIGHT]


I come to not only bury Caesar, but also praise him. [RIGHT]


I come to bury not only Caesar, but also Brutus and Cassius as well. [RIGHT]



Your sentence, however, seems to run afoul of none of these problems, because you are correctly using parallel grammatical pieces in both halves.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.