Skip to main content

Generally speaking, compared to the Middle Ages, there were higher standards of living, greater economic opportunities, and a higher life...

Firstly, if there is a specific context to which you are referring (e.g., a book that you are reading), please be sure to include that so that we may help you with referencing. Otherwise, if you are speaking merely in terms of historical contexts, I would have to disagree with you slightly.


The Middle Ages, sometimes still referred to as The Dark Ages, generally get a bad rap. It is true that those who lived during The Middle Ages were more concerned with religion, but this was due to the desire to firmly establish Christianity in the West, which remained under perceived threat from pagan Vikings in the North -- who frequently sacked the continent -- and Muslims from the East. 


It is also true that literacy did not begin to expand until the Late Middle Ages (c. 1300), as romances began to include the middle-class. Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales was written for and about such an audience. However, even before this time, there was an appreciation for illuminated manuscripts, romances, and visual art. It is just that these pleasures were only accessible to clergymen and members of royal courts. 


Economic opportunities existed during the Late Middle Ages through guilds. However, you are right to say that such opportunities increased during the Renaissance -- particularly since the Renaissance coincided with The Age of Exploration, which expanded trade opportunities for some nations. 


To answer your question, I would say that Humanism was the reason "for the rebirth of the cult of beauty." I left out the first part of your assessment because "the heroic ideal" was actually more preponderant in The Middle Ages. Look at the romances written from 1150-1500 in Middle English: King HornGuy of Warwick, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. All are romantic heroes. One could even look to Beowulf, written during the Early Middle Ages, for the construction of the heroic ideal. 


Humanism was centered on the belief that rational approaches were key to solving most of the problems of civilization. It also subordinated the Church's absolute authority, arguing that people were not innately sinful, but innately good. Therefore, human ideas should take precedence over those centered on the divine or the supernatural. The best examples the humanists had for this elevation of human ideas and creativity were those from the Classical world. It is no coincidence that Italy was the center of the Renaissance: the remnants of Ancient Rome's greatness were all around.


"The cult of beauty," as you call it, elevated Classical ideas about form and, most importantly, shamelessly depicted the nude human body. The body was not a source of sin, but a source of beauty for Renaissance painters.


In paintings from the Middle Ages, only religious figures were depicted and they were always clothed. Renaissance painters also depicted religious figures, but individualized them and allowed them to emote. However, Renaissance painters also depicted the pagan gods of the ancient world. In some paintings, religious figures were represented in forms that resembled ancient sculptures of pagan gods, allowing for an intermingling of religious and mythical contexts. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.