Skip to main content

Why are people more apt to help those in far away countries but have a hard time helping the poor in their own communities? What is the difference...

The argument could be made that it is easier to help someone farther away than it is to help someone in our community.


If you take the example of a hungry child in Africa, for example, most people simply write a check to a charity that sends food to that child. The person writing the check does not have to do any of the work of getting the food to the person or actually getting to know the person.


However, when we help someone in our own community, we often do more personal work to help that person. Feeding a hungry child in your own community might include writing a check, but it might also include serving food at a church or handing out food at a food pantry. Each of these would involve meeting the child and seeing the consequences of their hunger, which is difficult to do because no one wants to see a child go hungry. So, emotionally it can be more difficult to help a person closer to home. It has the potential for being much more intimate.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more