Skip to main content

How is Winston Smith a dynamic character in George Orwell's 1984? How does he change from beginning to end, and what do his little acts of...

Before answering this question regarding George Orwell's protagonist in his dystopian novel 1984, it's important that we define the literary term that you use in your question. A "dynamic character" is a character that develops in some capacity, experiencing growth or change in his/her perspective, values, actions, or otherwise. 


To examine Winston's growth, we must first establish his starting point. In the beginning of the novel, Winston is miserable but quietly rebellious. The grand overview of his life is dictated by his dehumanizing society, but he secretly engages in small acts of rebellion, which to the reader seem symbolic, but within the context of the society, are terrifying to contemplate. Acts like writing "Down with Big Brother" or holding onto memories that contradict Party edicts could potentially get Winston killed. 


As Winston grows, his rebellions also expand, until he engages in a forbidden act: a loving relationship with Julia. Once Winston is caught, his character changes again, beaten down by the physical and psychological torture that O'Brien and others instill upon him. 


By the end of the novel, Winston is broken and empty, plunging him past his original miserable existence into untapped depths of conformity and despair. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.