Skip to main content

In "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, how is the language effective in showing emotion?

In "Shooting an Elephant," Orwell uses language effectively to convey the harsh realities of British imperialism. In the second paragraph, for example, Orwell uses imagery to describe the conditions of the Burmese prisoners. By using words like "wretched," "stinking" and "scarred," Orwell creates powerful images of violence and imprisonment to portray his sense of injustice towards these captive men.


Similarly, when Orwell shoots the elephant, he uses language in a way that enables the reader to empathise with his moral dilemma. The elephant, for example, is portrayed as harmless and vulnerable:



He…climbed with desperate slowness to his feet and stood weakly upright, with legs sagging and head drooping.



By employing language in this manner, Orwell transforms the elephant from a raging, murdering beast into a helpless creature. The reader thus sees the situation from Orwell's point of view: he never wanted to shoot the elephant because he knew that it would eventually calm down. He did it because imperialism dictated that he act with authority, and this is the message at the heart of the story. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.