Skip to main content

Why won't the mermaids sing to the speaker and what does this say about him in T. S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock"?

This question is referencing a passage late in T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." To put it in context, I've listed the passage in full:



I shall wear flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.


I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.


I do not think that they will sing to me (123-5).



To understand this passage, which is one of the most important parts of the poem, you also have to understand the underlying themes of the piece. Like much of Eliot's most famous work, "Prufrock" depicts the emptiness and hollow isolation of modern life. The narrator appears to be a middle-aged man struggling to find meaning and purpose in the crushing context of the modern world. Moreover, if one reads between the lines, it seems the speaker is particularly lonely and longs for a romantic relationship (or at least female companionship). He lacks the courage or assertiveness to actively connect to another person, however, so he seems doomed to a life of isolation.


In many ways, the mermaids' refusal to sing to Prufrock encompasses this theme of isolation. Cut off from romance and meaningful human relationships, Prufrock encapsulates his loneliness by imagining singing mermaids, seductive beings and potential allusions to the sirens in The Odyssey. Based on the context of the poem, we can assume the mermaids do not sing for Prufrock because he lacks the confidence or ability to develop meaningful human relationships. Moreover, by asserting that the mermaids do not sing for him, Prufrock displays his belief that he is a completely uninteresting, hopeless, and undesirable individual. It's a sad image, and one that neatly encapsulates Eliot's gloomy vision of modern life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...