Skip to main content

What does standpoint theory mean in terms of the theoretical work and everyday lived realities of women and minorities? How did this standpoint...

Standpoint theory argues that how we experience and talk about the world is rooted in the totality of our own experiences. This moves away from the simplistic notion that all Latina women, for example, must think alike, because as well as being Latina, a woman might also be upper or lower class, a recent illegal immigrant or someone whose family has lived in the United States for many generations, a resident of a big city or a rural area, trans- or cis-gendered, young or old, etc. Standpoints are always intersectional. When we talk about everyday lives, they don't exist in a vacuum and cannot be understood through some singular perspective. Instead, the objective conditions of our lives are refracted through multiple simultaneous subjectivities.


The historical grounding of standpoint theory is Hegel's understanding of the nature of the master-slave relationship, something that Marx expanded into an analysis of class. The dominant group in a relationship does not just have objective power, but also ideological power; dominant groups control the way discourses about issues are framed. The problem with this is that the subjective viewpoint of a dominant group is not objective, but dominance allows some groups to control discourse and ensuing ideology, leading to what Marxists refer to as the problem of "false ideology." Standpoint theory attempts to correct this bias by examining how our fundamental assumptions about our world are determined by our position within the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.