Skip to main content

How would you explain the quote “But they were sailing together lashed side by side and the old man thought, let him bring me in if it pleases...

This important quote from Ernest Hemingway’s Pulitzer Prize winning novella The Old Man and the Sea is a crucial component in the story for a number of reasons. First, this quote comes when Santiago realizes that the fish is so massive that it may very well be towing the boat:



“Then his head started to become a little unclear and he thought, is he bringing me in or am I bringing him in? If I were towing him behind there would be no question. Nor if the fish were in the skiff, with all dignity gone” (99).



This leads Santiago to question who is catching who; is he bringing in the fish, or is the fish towing him along? Santiago is driven to pulling in this massive marlin, but he simultaneously respects it and the awesome power of nature. Indeed, that is why he resigns himself to the fact that he is only better than the catch “through trickery.” He feels kinship with this mighty, determined fish. The fish is not out to ruin Santiago; it is merely existing, living its life much like Santiago. That is why the image of the boat and the marlin “sailing together lashed side by side” is so powerful. Santiago respects this majestic animal and its will to not be captured, but he will not let this interfere with his own iron will. His kinship and respect with the fish makes the quote in your question resonate; he respects it as an equal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.