Skip to main content

In "The Monkeys Paw," why do Mr. and Mrs. White believe that the second wish has not come true?

In W. W. Jacobs's short story "The Monkey's Paw," the White family, mother, father and son, come to be in possession of a supposedly magical monkey's paw. According to Sergeant Major Morris, the paw will grant its owner three wishes. In an ominous explanation of the paw's power, Morris explains that one of the paw's owners asked for death with his last wish. Nevertheless, Mr. White obtains the paw and uses his first wish to ask for enough money to pay off the mortgage on his house. The very next day he is promptly rewarded with just that amount when his son turns up dead in an accident at work. His wife, overcome with sorrow, pleads with Mr. White to use the second wish to bring the son back to life again. In the immediate aftermath of making the wish, nothing seems to happen, and the couple goes to bed thinking the wish has not been granted. They seem to forget that the first wish did not happen immediately. They also do not take into account the fact that the cemetery where the son was buried is two miles away. Moreover, the son was badly mutilated in the incident and is now a hideous corpse who is most certainly slow and unwieldy. Soon enough, however, Mr. White is awakened by a sound, and then a loud knock brings Mrs. White from her bed as well. She says,



"It's my boy; it's Herbert!" she cried, struggling mechanically. "I forgot it was two miles away. What are you holding me for? Let go. I must open the door."



Realizing that his son is now a terrible monster, Mr. White finds the monkey's paw and, with his last wish, summons the corpse away just as Mrs. White is about to open the door to let the thing in.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more