Skip to main content

If you added an equal volume of a strong alkali to a weak acid (e.g. vinegar pH=4) what pH would you expect to get?

The reaction of solutions of acid and base can be generally represented as:


Acid + Base = Salt + Water


where


Acid contains an H that can be protonated producing the conjugate base


and 


Base as an alkali base, has an alkali metal combined with a hydroxide.



In your question, the reaction of equal volume of vinegar with an alkali base can be represented as:



`CH_3 COOH + MOH = CH_3 COO^(-) M^(+) + H_2 O `


where


MOH is the Alkali base and;


CH3COOH is Acetic acid, the weak acid present in vinegars.


The concentration of the product CH3COO-M+ is dependent on the concentrations of the alkali base and the acid. 1 mole of the base reacting with 1 mole of the acid will produce 1 mole of CH3COO-M+ in the solution. The pH of the resulting solution will be greater than pH = 4 since the acetic acid will be consumed in the reaction. 


Since acetic acid is a weak acid, the neutralization reaction of 1 mole of the acid and 1 mole of the base will not give a neutral solution. The reason is because the salt CH3COO-M+ will dissociate in the same reaction as:



`CH_3 COO^(-) M^(+) = CH_3 COO^(-) + M^(+) `


where CH3COO- is the acetate ion and M+ is the alkali metal ion. 


The acetate ion being a conjugate base of a weak acid will react with the water in the solution as:



`CH_3 COO^(-) + H_2 O =CH_3 COOH + OH^(-). `


The production of OH- in the solution will increase the pH of the solution compared with the pH of vinegar.


Therefore, mixing equal volumes of alkali acid and acetic acid will increase the pH of the resulting solution. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more