Skip to main content

Where do diamonds come from?

Contrary to popular belief, diamonds do not actually from coal, at least not usually. Coal is a relatively recent phenomenon in geological terms, as it required land plants to live, die, and then be compressed over millions of years. Diamonds are much, much older.

The most common way for diamonds to form is in the Earth's mantle, in particular regions with just the right level of temperature and pressure and sufficient carbon in the surrounding rocks. These regions are most commonly found under the middles of continental plates. We of course could never dig that far down into the mantle; fortunately, volcanic eruptions occasionally bring up parts of the mantle containing these diamonds close to the surface, where we can extract them.

Diamonds can also be formed by the collision of tectonic plates, particularly in subduction zones where an oceanic plate is pushed under a continental plate.

Diamonds can come from meteorites, in one of two ways: Either they can be formed in space by collisions between asteroids, or they can be formed at the moment the meteorite hits the ground and releases all its kinetic energy.

Finally, we can now synthesize diamonds by subjecting graphite or coal to extremely high temperature and pressure. These diamonds are usually small and not very pretty---but they are just as hard as any other diamond. (Large, attractive synthetic gemstones can be produced, they just aren't nearly as common.) In fact, most of the world's diamond consumption is in the form of synthetic diamonds, though not as gemstones but for industrial equipment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.