Skip to main content

Do you believe that Cassius was more or less successful than Brutus in addressing the mob?

In my opinion, both Cassius and Brutus addressed the mob and explained the situation reasonably well. The First Citizen was satisfied with Brutus’ explanation, and the Second Citizen shared the same position after listening to Cassius. They were all in agreement that, although Caesar’s death was necessary, he should be honored by the people for his deeds.


SECOND CITIZEN:

Give him a statue with his ancestors.

FIRST CITIZEN:

We'll bring him to his house with shouts and clamors.

However, Brutus’ and Cassius’ progress at pacification was cut short when Marc Antony took to the platform. In his speech, Antony presented strong examples that showed Caesar was not ambitious, and he did not deserve to die. In addition, he affirmed Caesar’s love for the people by reading his will which left a significant portion of his property to the masses. His speech completely diluted both Brutus’ and Cassius’ attempts at settling the public. By the time Antony was done, all citizens in attendance were completely against the conspirators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.