Skip to main content

What was the aim of the lottery?

Shirley Jackson's 1948 short story The Lottery begins in a quaint village where everyone is gathering for an annual ritual; the lottery.  The old box where slips of paper are drawn is brought to the town square and a listing of households is presented.  The story suggests the town has a strong desire to see everyone is present and fairly represented at the drawing.  After the first drawing Tessie Hutchinson argues her husband Bill, who drew the black dot, was not treated fairly.  A second drawing is held with only members of the family.  Tessie draws the final black dot which condemns her to death by stoning.


The aim of the lottery in the story is to pick from the townspeople who will be the victim of a brutal murder in an equitable manner.  The greater meaning behind the ritual is never revealed.  Jackson mentions several times throughout the story that the ritual has gone on for so many years the originating story has long been forgotten.  Some towns have even done away with the lottery, which draws the ire of some.


The story is a cautionary tale.  Blindly following rituals or any custom because it has always been done that way can blind those involved to a greater injustice.  Jackson offers hope by mentioning some towns stopping the violence.  The story has a bleak ending where Tessie is ostracized in an instant and stoned.  The tale cautions people to understand the real reason behind an action before following it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more