Skip to main content

In Oedipus Rex, to what extent does Sophocles position the chorus in order to create dramatic tension?

Oedipus decides to search for the killer of Laius, both because the oracle has stated that it is the only way to rid Thebes of all its problems as well as because "in righting [Laius] [Oedipus] serves [him]self."  He figures that whoever slew Laius might return to slay him too.  Immediately after this, the Chorus prays to the gods and laments the sad times in Thebes.  When they are finished, Oedipus steps in, rather pridefully, and assures them that he has the situation well in hand.  His pride while addressing them, and his assurance that he can handle the situation (rather than praying to the gods as a more humble man might do), certainly increases the dramatic tension in the play.  Sophocles's audience would already have known Oedipus's story, and so his proud response to the Chorus builds dramatic irony -- when the audience knows more than the character -- increasing tension as well. 


After Teiresias has essentially told Oedipus that he is the killer, the Chorus again speaks.  They are "Sore perplexed" by what the prophet has said, doubting not that he could be wrong because they know he receives his knowledge from the gods.  Again, however, Oedipus stands in contrast to them, doubting everything Tieresias has said and even accusing him of plotting with Creon to take his throne.  To doubt Teiresias is to proudly doubt the gods, especially Apollo, who grants the gift of prophecy.  It is a proud and dangerous thing to doubt the gods and their prophets like this.  Once again, the difference between the Chorus's piety and humility and Oedipus's hubris is quite stark and creates a good deal of dramatic tension.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.