Skip to main content

In "The Way Up to Heaven," what type of narrator does Dahl use? Does the point of view stay the same for the whole story, or does it shift? If it...

In "The Way Up to Heaven," the author uses the common third-person anonymous narrator with the point of view limited to a single character, Mrs. Foster. The narrator is seemingly omniscient but does not go into Mr. Foster's mind as he does throughout the story with Mrs. Foster. She often wonders about her husband's secret thoughts, but the narrator only suggests what he is thinking by describing what he says and does. It isn't until the end of the story that Mrs. Foster realizes how her husband has been torturing her over the years by creating delays that make her miss important appointments, just as he does in "The Way Up to Heaven."



All her life, Mrs. Foster had had an almost pathological fear of missing a train, a plane, a boat, or even a theatre curtain. In other respects, she was not a particularly nervous woman, but the mere thought of being late on occasions like these would throw her into such a state of nerves that she would begin to twitch.



When she realizes the truth and has an opportunity to get back at her secretly sadistic husband, she takes advantage of it by letting him get stuck between floors in their private elevator. Since they are both vacating their townhouse for at least six weeks, Mr. Foster will have died a lingering death in the stuck elevator by the time she returns from Europe.


The narrator moves freely into Mrs. Foster's mind, but not into her husband's. Mr. Foster is always observed from her point of view. The narrator makes it plain that she suspects her husband is tormenting her but that she cannot be sure. Here is an example of how Mr. Foster's probable motives are represented.



She couldn’t be sure, but it seemed to her that there was suddenly a new note in his voice, and she turned to look at him. It was difficult to observe any change in his expression under all that hair. The mouth was what counted. She wished, as she had so often before, that she could see the mouth clearly. The eyes never showed anything except when he was in a rage.



The reader naturally identifies with Mrs. Foster because of being held in that character's point of view and also because it is natural to share her anxiety about being late for such an important matter as catching a flight from New York City to Paris. The fact that the trip is of such importance to her brings out the sadism of her hateful husband. It also explains the severity of her retaliation when she hears the elevator getting stuck between floors and leaves him to die a horrible death.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...