Skip to main content

word choice - "Fluids" versus "liquids"?


What is the difference between fluid and liquid?


I'm thinking of this in the context of drink plenty of fluids.



Answer



A fluid can either be a liquid or a gas; as such, fluid is a hypernym of liquid in this regard. In your example



Drink plenty of fluids



it's only idiomatic to use fluids instead of liquids. (I wonder what else could be drunk besides a liquid/fluid, anyway!) You also hear things like:



Your body needs lots of fluids



In day-to-day usage, one will find liquid only used when the state of matter of a substance is in question or important to note. For example:



"How's the brownie mix looking?" "It's still basically liquid!"



When ice-cream is involved, melted is more likely to be used instead of liquid. One may also find liquid used in a financial context:



They think I'm liquid but, man, I'm flat broke!



Fluid just sounds smoother and it rolls off the tongue much easier. That probably explains why it's more commonly used in place of liquid. People would probably use gas if they wanted to be specific. Here are some common idiomatic phrases:



  • body fluids

  • engine fluid

  • transmission fluid

  • poisonous liquid

  • hot liquid

  • toxic fluid[s]

  • liquid coolant

  • cooling fluid


From the above examples, you may notice that fluid tends to be used for a liquid substance that has a specified/particular purpose. Thus, transmission liquid would be unidiomatic, for instance.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.