Is “of” instead of “have” correct?
It bothers me that so many people use could of
, would of
, should of
instead of could've
or could have
, etc.
For instance, I have seen people write I could of been hurt
or I should of seen that truck
.
Does anyone know how this originated? Is this a mistake only American English speakers make, or is it common with British English speakers too?
Also, is that actually legal English?
Answer
The Oxford English Dictionary describes the etymology as:
Variant of have arising through misapprehension of the verb (when occurring as a clitic) as showing of.
It is described as being nonstandard and the definition is given as:
= have verb, used in the infinitive as the auxiliary of the perfect tense (especially in conjunction with modal verbs). Frequently in representations of non-standard speech.
The earliest recorded use is dated 1814, and it appears in a letter written in 1853 by the British novelist Charlotte Brontë.
Comments
Post a Comment