Skip to main content

In To Kill a Mockingbird, how do Atticus, Aunt Alexandra, and Dr. Reynolds treat Boo/Arthur?

Atticus, Aunt Alexandra, and Dr. Reynolds all treat Arthur Radley with respect. They all address him as Arthur, not by his nickname, Boo. Even though Arthur doesn't speak, each adult acknowledges him when he is in the room by greeting him properly as a guest. They don't get in his face, though. They don't expect him to carry on a conversation, so they don't ask him questions which might make the situation more awkward.


Scout is the first to point out Arthur Radley's presence in the Finch house at the end of chapter 29 by saying "Hey, Boo" (270). At the beginning of chapter 30, Atticus reminds Scout of her manners and tells her to call him "Mr. Arthur," not Boo. Dr. Reynolds happens to appear at this time, sees Arthur, and politely says, "Evenin', Arthur. Didn't notice you the first time I was here" (271).


Scout is amazed that the adults are treating Arthur as though he spoke with each of them every day of his life. For Scout, this is an unprecedented event to see, and be in the presence of, Boo Radley, the infamous and legendary secret man of Maycomb. Surprisingly, even Aunt Alexandra, a highly prejudiced and gossipy woman, speaks to Arthur sweetly by saying, "Come in, Arthur . . . He's still asleep" (277). Although Scout is beside herself with joy to finally meet Boo Radley, the adults in her life do not act childish. They act with respect and dignity towards the quiet and very private neighbor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more