Skip to main content

What type of diction is used in the poem Ozymandias by Percy Bysshe Shelley?

Diction means choice of words.  The diction in Ozymandias is lofty, slightly unusual, and it paints vivid pictures.


By "lofty," I mean the author often chooses longer words that would be familiar to an educated person.  For example, the author uses "antique" instead of "ancient," "visage" instead of "face," and "colossal" instead of "huge."  This is formal, classroom diction, not the diction of the home or street.


Sometimes the poem uses a word that is not exactly loftier than the expected word, but it is a little different.  For example, the fallen statue is called a "wreck" instead of a "ruin" as we would expect.  Wreck is more often applied to ships, not ancient stone statues.


Sometimes these slightly odd word choices help the rhythm or rhyme of the poem.  For example, "Nothing beside remains." If the poet had written, "Nothing else remains," that line would not have had the right number of syllables.  "The lone and level sands stretch far away" sounds better than "The lonely, level sands stretch far away."  Stone in a desert does not really decay, but "Round the decay" rhymes with "far away" later, and matches it thematically as well. 


Finally, sometimes the author's diction allows him to paint a vivid picture more quickly than with more ordinary words.  "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone" is more concise than saying "The two remaining legs of a huge statue, the rest of which has fallen down," and it is more vivid too, since it emphasizes both the size and oddity of the legs.  "Those passions ... Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things" is more concise and more vivid than saying "The subject's attitudes, which are still clearly visible on the face of the statue."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.