Skip to main content

How does the behavior of the school children in To Kill a Mockingbird depict parental influence?

During lunchtime, Miss Caroline notices Walter Cunningham Jr. doesn't have a lunch and offers to lend him a quarter to buy one. Walter Cunningham timidly refuses Miss Caroline's quarter. Miss Caroline, unfamiliar with Walter's family background, offers him the quarter again. Again, Walter refuses to accept the quarter. Scout gives insight into why Walter will not accept the quarter by saying,



"The Cunninghams never took anything they can’t pay back—no church baskets, and no scrip stamps. They never took anything off of anybody, they get along on what they have" (Lee 14).



Walter's parents are self-reliant and have integrity. He is influenced by their moral character and does not accept Miss Caroline's quarter because he knows he cannot pay her back.


In Chapter 3, a small bug crawls out of Burris Ewell's hair, and Miss Caroline tells him to bathe before he comes back to school tomorrow. Burris rudely responds by saying, "You ain’t sendin’ me home, missus. I was on the verge of leavin’ — I done done my time for this year" (Lee 18). One of Scout's classmates explains to Miss Caroline that Burris' father is contentious and doesn't care if he attends school or not. When Miss Caroline asks Burris to sit down, he says, "You try and make me, missus" (Lee 18). Burris then proceeds to cuss at Miss Caroline, calling her a "snot-nosed slut of a schoolteacher." Burris' disrespectful behavior is similar to his father's. Bob Ewell is the most despicable citizen in Maycomb and Burris is greatly influenced by his father's negative personality. Burris is rude and offensive just like his father.


Both Walter and Burris are products of their environment and are greatly influenced by their parents. Like his father, Walter has integrity; Burris is a disrespectful individual like Bob Ewell.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more