Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, what are the reasons that lead Friar Lawrence to give Juliet the vial of potion?

After being informed that her father has agreed to give her in marriage to Count Paris, Juliet is desperate. She is, of course, already married to the banished Romeo. In the beginning of Act IV, she goes to Friar Laurence to seek advice. She threatens to kill herself if the Friar does not have a solution. The Friar comes up with a plan which will help Juliet avoid marrying Paris. Earlier in the play, he married Juliet to Romeo, so he cannot marry her again. He also wants Romeo and Juliet to be happy, so the only solution seems to be to reunite the two young lovers. The audience also knows that the Friar is somewhat of a scientist (he speaks of this in Act II, Scene 3) and so it is plausible that he could come up with a plan for Juliet to fake her death.


It involves Juliet taking a potion which will make her seem as though she is dead for almost two days ("two and forty hours"). His plot has three important parts. First, Juliet must put on a happy face and tell her father that she will agree to marry Count Paris. Second, she must actually drink the vial of potion while she is alone in her bedroom. He tells her that it will cause her to become "stiff and stark and cold" and that the rosiness of her lips and cheeks will "fade." Third, the Friar plans on sending a letter to Romeo to inform him of the plan. He will instruct Romeo to come to Capulet's tomb where Juliet will be placed, and to be there at the time when the girl is set to wake up. Romeo will then take her with him back to Mantua and they will be "free" from "shame." Juliet, who demonstrates a fearless and courageous nature, agrees to the Friar's plan and goes off with the vial.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...