Skip to main content

Scan the following line in iambic pentameter: "I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold," from "To My Dear and Loving Husband" by Anne...

Scanning a line of poetry or an entire poem means that you are being asked to mark out the rhythm and meter of the poem. Any line of poetry is going to have words that contain stressed and/or unstressed syllables. Many poets will try to pick a syllable pattern and repeat it throughout each line in the entire poem. The repetition of that syllable pattern creates rhythm. Each unit of rhythm is called a "foot."


The question states that "To My Dear and Loving Husband" is written in iambic pentameter. That is correct, although line 10 does slightly deviate. That means each line of the poem contains the iambic foot. An iambic foot contains an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable. Some common iambic words are the following: behold, awake, destroy, and employ. Each line of "To My Dear and Loving Husband" is a repetition of the unstressed/stressed syllable pattern. That is the poem's meter. Each line of the poem contains five iambic feet, which is why it is called iambic pentameter.


Typically when a person scans a line of poetry, he/she marks out each stressed and unstressed syllable with a mark above the syllable. A "-" means unstressed and a "/" means stressed. The line that the question asks about would look like the following:


 -   /        -         /     -          /          -       /         -    /                                      I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold,


If that's not clear, it's possible to scan a line of poetry by using capital letters for the stressed syllables. For example, 


i PRIZE thy LOVE more THAN whole MINES of GOLD,


This method is more awkward to type and read, so I don't prefer it.


You could also use bold to mark out the stressed syllables:  


prize thy love more than whole mines of gold

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...