Skip to main content

How did the CIA participate in the Cold War?

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) participated in the Cold War in two main ways.  First, since it was a spy agency, it engaged in espionage.  Second, it undertook other covert operations around the world to try to undermine governments that sympathized with the Soviet Union.


The CIA was and is an intelligence agency.  That means that it is supposed to gather information about foreign countries that the US can use to its own advantage.  The CIA did this in the Cold War.  It tried through various methods to learn about other countries.  For example, the CIA operated spy planes that flew over places such as the USSR and Cuba, trying to gather information about military installations in those countries.  In this and many other ways, the CIA worked to give the US government more information about other countries during the Cold War.


However, the CIA did not limit itself to gathering intelligence.  Instead, it also tried to change things in some countries.  In other words, it engaged in secret activities that were meant to weaken pro-Soviet governments.  One example of this was in Iran in 1953.  There, the CIA helped to bring about a coup that overthrew Mohammed Mossadegh, who was the leader of the country.  The US felt that Mossadegh was a communist and wanted a more pro-Western government in place.  The CIA was also in charge of the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, in which the US tried to overthrow the regime of Fidel Castro.  In these ways and others, the CIA actively tried to change conditions in other countries rather than just gathering information about those conditions.


 Thus, the CIA participated in the Cold War both by spying/gathering information and by engaging in covert actions to change conditions in foreign countries.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.