Skip to main content

Why did Mr. Martin decide he had to "rub out" Ulgine Barrows?

"The Catbird Seat" starts off like a conventional murder story. The author James Thurber wants the reader to expect that Mr. Martin intends to commit a perfect crime. Ulgine Barrows became a "special assistant to the president of the firm, Mr. Fitweiler," where Martin was head of the filing department at F & S. Martin had loathed the woman from the moment he met her. She is loud, vulgar, and incompetent. In the short time she has been with the firm, she has created chaos in some of the departments--and now Martin knows instinctively that she has her eye on his beloved filing department. She obviously thinks it needs streamlining. She is thinking of throwing out a lot of the older files and selling the steel cabinets for scrap. Two comments that reveal her budding intentions are the following:



"Do you really need all these filing cabinets?"



And:



"But you sure have got a lot of fine scrap in here!"



At present she has Mr. Fitweiler's complete confidence, support, and authority. This is why Martin has decided that the only way he can save his department is to kill her. His plan is to make it look as if the man who murdered her in her apartment had to be someone whose character was entirely different from Martin's own well-known ultra-conservative, abstemious, strictly routine behavior. He buys a pack of cigarettes because he is known to be a non-smoker. 



It was his idea to puff a few puffs on a Camel (after the rubbing-out), stub it out in the ashtray holding her lipstick-stained Luckies, and thus drag a small red herring across the trail.



When he gets to her apartment he asks for a Scotch-and-soda because it is well known that he is a non-drinker as well as a non-smoker.


But the story, which seemed to be developing into a fairly standard murder mystery of the perfect-crime sub-genre, suddenly takes a turn. Martin realizes that he isn't a murderer but that he can utilize the contradictions between his clues and his character in another way. The next morning Ulgine Barrows dashes into Fitweilers office to report everything Martin did and everything he told her. Fitweiler can hardly believe his ears. He has known Martin for twenty-two years. Martin tells him:



"I walked home. Then  I went to Schrafft's for dinner. Afterward I walked home again. I went to bed early, sir, and read a magazine for a while. I was asleep before eleven."



While the two men are talking, Ulgine Barrows storms back into the president's office. 



"Is the little rat denying it?" she screamed. "He can't get away with that!....You drank and smoked at my apartment," she bawled at Mr. Martin. "You called Mr. Fitweiler an old windbag and said you were going to blow him up when you got coked to the gills on your heroin!....If you weren't such a drab, ordinary little man," she said, "I'd think you planned it all. Sticking your tongue out, saying you were sitting in the catbird seat, because you thought no one would believe me when I told it! My God, it's really too perfect!"



"Perfect" is really the right term, because Mr. Martin has always been a perfectionist. Ulgine Barrows' temper tantrum and her seemingly wild accusations only confirm Mr. Fitweiler's belief that the woman "has suffered a complete breakdown." He has to call for help to have her forcibly ejected from his office. That is the end of her services at F & S.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more