Managerial economics is studied as a separate field because it combines two broad subjects, management and economics. Managerial economics blends the theories of economics in the management process. Focus is mainly directed towards microeconomics and business decision making. The aim of the course is to develop knowledge on how information from the field of economics can be used to optimize managerial decisions, which mostly revolve around resources and their allocation. Business administrators would thus have valuable information that would guide them on what products to pursue, how much of the product to produce and the right price to charge for the product among other aspects of business. The decisions are mostly based on capital available, market demand and labor among other resources required by the business to turn inputs to outputs. In addition, the extensive theories make it necessary to study managerial economics separately given that microeconomics is a broad subject on its own.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment