J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series is written from the third person limited perspective. This means that, though the narrative is written in the third person, the perspective is limited to one specific character's experiences. Thus, Rowling's narrator's perception is limited in that the narrative is pretty much only told from Harry's perspective (there are a few exceptions to this rule in the series, but they are rare). As heroic as he is, Harry can't possibly be everywhere at once, so he is unable to know everything that's going on in the world of witchcraft and wizardry. Moreover, he can't know other characters' exact thoughts. As a result, the narrator's perception is limited in the Harry Potter series in that the narrative is essentially confined to Harry's personal experiences.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment